Close Menu
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from Motor Fortune about Electric Cars, Luxury Cars, design and More.

What's Hot

BMW recalls a whopping 720,000 cars including 5-Series, X5, Z4 models

November 14, 2026

Check your ego at the door: Stellantis’ new electric dolly turns ANY car into a tow rig

November 14, 2026

Huawei set to challenge Tesla Powerwall with new, 20 kW home battery

November 14, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Motors MachineMotors Machine
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice
Motors MachineMotors Machine
Electric car

The Starship moon landing number NASA and Elon Musk can’t agree on

SofiaBy SofiaOctober 23, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Elon Musk is disputing a new NASA safety panel estimate of how many Starship launches it will take to put astronauts on the Moon, saying the real number will be less than half the panel’s figure.

On Thursday, NASA’s Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel held its quarterly public meeting. Panel member Charlie Precourt, a former NASA astronaut, flagged the fueling process for SpaceX’s lunar lander as a major risk for Artemis IV, the mission planned to land a crew on the Moon in 2028. “We need to keep our eyes on numerous required fuelings for the lander,” Precourt said, according to Ars Technica. “I think the last estimate is around 22 flights.”

Ars Technica’s Eric Berger posted the comment on X, and Musk replied. “That’s way too high,” Musk wrote. “Actual number will be more like 6 to 8.”


The disagreement comes down to a basic problem with sending a ship as large as Starship to the Moon. Starship burns nearly all of its propellant just reaching Earth orbit, so it cannot continue on to the Moon without stopping for a refill. SpaceX’s answer is a gas station in space. First, a Starship that works as a storage tank, called a depot, is launched into orbit. Then a series of tanker Starships launch one at a time, dock with the depot and pump their leftover propellant into it. Once the depot is full, the lunar lander version of Starship launches, docks, fills up and heads for the Moon.

Every tanker trip is its own full rocket launch, which is why the count matters. More launches mean more time, more cost and more chances for something to go wrong before astronauts ever leave Earth. Berger estimated that even if SpaceX reaches twice weekly Starship launches by the end of 2027, filling a depot at the panel’s number would still take roughly three months.

See also  Tesla is fixing Full Self-Driving's pothole problem

How many tankers are needed depends mostly on how much propellant each one can carry to orbit and how much is lost along the way. Starship’s fuel and oxygen are stored at extremely cold temperatures, and some of it slowly boils off while waiting in orbit. More is lost in each transfer. NASA appears to be working from what Starship can lift today, while Musk’s range assumes a more capable rocket.

Musk has pushed back on higher counts before. In 2021, after a government document suggested 16 launches, he called that “extremely unlikely” and said eight tankers would be the most required.

Much of the answer depends on hardware SpaceX has not finished flying. As Teslarati noted earlier this year, the company plans to carry out the refueling process with its upgraded V3 Starship, and Precourt described Artemis IV as carrying “a large number of firsts.” He also praised NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman’s team for working to clear obstacles for both SpaceX and Blue Origin, whose Blue Moon lander does not rely on orbital refueling for its first mission.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Sofia

Related Posts

Check your ego at the door: Stellantis’ new electric dolly turns ANY car into a tow rig

November 14, 2026

Huawei set to challenge Tesla Powerwall with new, 20 kW home battery

November 14, 2026

Tesla Cybercab arrives with steep ownership fine print

November 14, 2026

Diesel Prices Are Surging. This Electric Trucking Company Is Seeing More Interest

November 14, 2026

Tesla Cybercab’s autonomy agreement is insane: $299/mo or it doesn’t move

November 14, 2026

Tesla stops selling every Cybertruck except the $109,990 Cyberbeast

November 14, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

BMW recalls a whopping 720,000 cars including 5-Series, X5, Z4 models

November 14, 2026

Check your ego at the door: Stellantis’ new electric dolly turns ANY car into a tow rig

November 14, 2026

Huawei set to challenge Tesla Powerwall with new, 20 kW home battery

November 14, 2026
Latest Reviews
Reviews

The Used-Car Inspection Mistakes That Can Cost You Thousands

By SofiaNovember 14, 2026
Reviews

The Most Beginner-Friendly Touring Motorcycle

By SofiaNovember 13, 2026
Reviews

The Surprising Reason Your Car’s Fuel Economy Changes With The Seasons

By SofiaNovember 12, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from Motor Fortune about Electric Cars, Luxury Cars, design and More.

Most Popular

Dacia Spring vs Leapmotor T03: which baby EV is the biggest bargain?

June 23, 2025

India tells Elon Musk’s X to “Follow the Law” in latest censorship update

August 18, 2026

I Drove Mercedes’ New EV With A Silicon Anode Battery. The Future Is Here

October 16, 2026
Subscribe

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from Motor Fortune about Electric Cars, Luxury Cars, design and More.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Almaville Media.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.