Close Menu
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice
What's Hot

General Motors Isn't 'Walking Away' From EVs, Top Exec Says

October 24, 2026

BYD is taking its Rolls-Royce-like flagship EV overseas

October 24, 2026

Tesla shows what Roadster drivers will see on screen before thruster activation

October 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Motors MachineMotors Machine
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice
Motors MachineMotors Machine
Home»Electric car»The Starship moon landing number NASA and Elon Musk can’t agree on
Electric car

The Starship moon landing number NASA and Elon Musk can’t agree on

SofiaBy SofiaOctober 23, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Elon Musk is disputing a new NASA safety panel estimate of how many Starship launches it will take to put astronauts on the Moon, saying the real number will be less than half the panel’s figure.

On Thursday, NASA’s Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel held its quarterly public meeting. Panel member Charlie Precourt, a former NASA astronaut, flagged the fueling process for SpaceX’s lunar lander as a major risk for Artemis IV, the mission planned to land a crew on the Moon in 2028. “We need to keep our eyes on numerous required fuelings for the lander,” Precourt said, according to Ars Technica. “I think the last estimate is around 22 flights.”

Ars Technica’s Eric Berger posted the comment on X, and Musk replied. “That’s way too high,” Musk wrote. “Actual number will be more like 6 to 8.”


The disagreement comes down to a basic problem with sending a ship as large as Starship to the Moon. Starship burns nearly all of its propellant just reaching Earth orbit, so it cannot continue on to the Moon without stopping for a refill. SpaceX’s answer is a gas station in space. First, a Starship that works as a storage tank, called a depot, is launched into orbit. Then a series of tanker Starships launch one at a time, dock with the depot and pump their leftover propellant into it. Once the depot is full, the lunar lander version of Starship launches, docks, fills up and heads for the Moon.

Every tanker trip is its own full rocket launch, which is why the count matters. More launches mean more time, more cost and more chances for something to go wrong before astronauts ever leave Earth. Berger estimated that even if SpaceX reaches twice weekly Starship launches by the end of 2027, filling a depot at the panel’s number would still take roughly three months.

See also  Kia patent reveals a tough-looking off-road electric SUV

How many tankers are needed depends mostly on how much propellant each one can carry to orbit and how much is lost along the way. Starship’s fuel and oxygen are stored at extremely cold temperatures, and some of it slowly boils off while waiting in orbit. More is lost in each transfer. NASA appears to be working from what Starship can lift today, while Musk’s range assumes a more capable rocket.

Musk has pushed back on higher counts before. In 2021, after a government document suggested 16 launches, he called that “extremely unlikely” and said eight tankers would be the most required.

Much of the answer depends on hardware SpaceX has not finished flying. As Teslarati noted earlier this year, the company plans to carry out the refueling process with its upgraded V3 Starship, and Precourt described Artemis IV as carrying “a large number of firsts.” He also praised NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman’s team for working to clear obstacles for both SpaceX and Blue Origin, whose Blue Moon lander does not rely on orbital refueling for its first mission.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Sofia

Related Posts

General Motors Isn't 'Walking Away' From EVs, Top Exec Says

October 24, 2026

BYD is taking its Rolls-Royce-like flagship EV overseas

October 24, 2026

Tesla shows what Roadster drivers will see on screen before thruster activation

October 24, 2026

Kia Plans To Take On Affordable Chinese EVs In Canada With Its Sub-$40K EV3

October 24, 2026

Podcast: Tesla earnings discussion, new BYD Seagull, Mustang Mach-E update, and more

October 24, 2026

2026 Lexus ES 350e Review: Why This Is Toyota’s Best EV Yet

October 24, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

General Motors Isn't 'Walking Away' From EVs, Top Exec Says

October 24, 2026

BYD is taking its Rolls-Royce-like flagship EV overseas

October 24, 2026

Tesla shows what Roadster drivers will see on screen before thruster activation

October 24, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest Reviews
Reviews

Volkswagen T-Cross review

By SofiaOctober 10, 2026
Reviews

Used SsangYong Korando (Mk4, 2019-date) buyer’s guide: an SUV for just £10k

By SofiaOctober 9, 2026
Reviews

New MINI Cooper Paul Smith Edition 2026 review: fun, unique and understated

By SofiaOctober 8, 2026
Most Popular

Xiaomi Unveils Custom Chip For Driver-Assist Features

August 25, 2026

Ram punts 1500 REV electric truck to “late 2026”

February 24, 2025

Ram 1500 REV name has been trademarked

January 7, 2023
Subscribe
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Almaville Media.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.