Close Menu
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice
What's Hot

How The Volvo EX60 EV Can ‘See’ Deer Around Corners Through A New Update

August 26, 2026

Range Rover GT teaser video shows the electric SUV drifting in snow

August 26, 2026

These EV chargers hang from garage ceilings – and install in hours

August 26, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Motors MachineMotors Machine
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice
Motors MachineMotors Machine
Home»News»Battery replacement the next step?
News

Battery replacement the next step?

SofiaBy SofiaFebruary 9, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
  • Damage to the batteries’ separator could lead to shorts and/or fires
  • Recall campaigns from Stellantis, Ford, and Audi allow replacement of battery packs
  • New paperwork filed by battery supplier Samsung SDI says the issue remains under investigation

Plug-in hybrids from multiple automakers have been recalled due a potential issue with vehicles’ Samsung SDI-supplied battery cells that could cause loss of power or fires. And new paperwork filed with the federal government this week suggests that the issue has not yet been fully resolved.

A total of 180,196 vehicles are affected in the U.S., including 155,096 from Stellantis, 20,484 from Ford, and 4,616 from Audi. Each automaker, in recent months, already announced an individual recall for its respective vehicles.

2023 Ford Escape Plug-in Hybrid

Stellantis issued a battery-related recall for the Jeep Wrangler 4xe and Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe SUVs last October. Audi then recalled its Q5 and A7 plug-in hybrids in December, and Ford then issued a recall for plug-in hybrid versions of the Ford Escape and Lincoln Corsair SUVs in January.

All of these vehicles have Samsung SDI cells that are broadly similar, according to documents filed with the NHTSA, which emphasizing that exact specifications are still unique to each automaker. Each automaker told the safety agency that defects in these cells could lead to internal short circuits or fires. Ford and Stellantis also reported damage in the separator layer between the cathode and anode in some cells, which could lead to short circuits and fires. Ford and Audi both said internal analysis pointed to manufacturing defects, and both said they would install new software as a temporary remedy.

2022 Audi Q5 55 TFSI e plug-in hybrid

See also  Future of Leaf, Tesla Cybertruck crab mode, battery storage for fast-charging: Today’s Car DriftBreath

2022 Audi Q5 55 TFSI e plug-in hybrid

These new documents filed by Samsung SDI don’t expand the list of vehicles recalled, but they underscore that the issue lacks a clear resolution, as of yet. In paperwork filed February 5, Samsung SDI calls the issue “still under investigation” for both Ford and Audi. A letter from the NHTSA, reacting to the Samsing SDI filing and dated February 6, asks the battery supplier for a “summary of all warranty claims, field or service reports, and other information.”

In a statement provided to DriftBreath Reports Friday, Jeep parent Stellantis underscored that for its vehicles, the issue has been remedied. “The remedy includes a software update and, if necessary, replacement of the high-voltage battery, both provided at no cost to owners,” it stated, pointing to notification letters sent out in December. “Customer safety is our highest priority, and we appreciate the patience of our customers as we worked to resolve this matter and implement a solution for all affected vehicles.”

For now, owners of affected vehicles can call the respective automakers’ customer service departments for more information. Stellantis can be reached at 800-853-1403, Audi at 800-253-2834, and Ford at 866-436-7332.


–with reporting by Bengt Halvorson

Source link

battery replacement step
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Sofia

Related Posts

At $9,000, Is This 1994 Ford Mustang GT A Homage That’s Still A Hoot And A Half?

August 26, 2026

Are Cadillac And Lincoln Making A Mistake By Killing Off Affordable Luxury?

August 26, 2026

Here’s What Jalopnik Readers Think About Chinese Cars

August 25, 2026

This Is The Closest You’ll Get To An AMG G63 6×6 Without Spending A Million

August 24, 2026

Analysis Shows All Those Data Centers Under Construction Will Output As Much CO2 As 24 Million Cars

August 23, 2026

After Super Speeders, Florida’s Cops Are Now Cracking Down On Slow Drivers Too

August 23, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

How The Volvo EX60 EV Can ‘See’ Deer Around Corners Through A New Update

August 26, 2026

Getting Lost in The Land Rover Trek Competition

December 12, 2021

A Brief History in Zero to 60 MPH

December 12, 2021
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest Reviews
Reviews

Honda Will Keep Building Manual-Transmission Cars Even Though The Company Admits Demand Is Shrinking

By SofiaAugust 26, 2026
Reviews

Daniel Craig’s Old Land Rover Hits The Auction Block

By SofiaAugust 25, 2026
Reviews

New Audi Q7 2026 review: large SUV is good to drive at last

By SofiaAugust 25, 2026
Most Popular

Ford Mustang joins NC State Highway Patrol fleet

March 7, 2025

Electric Car Rebates and Incentives: What To Know by State

February 6, 2023

Mini Cooper SE Convertible is a production reality—for Europe

February 15, 2023
Subscribe
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Almaville Media.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.