Close Menu
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice
What's Hot

New Kia K4 review: a Korean counter-attack on the VW Golf

February 11, 2026

Iconic cars of the 1990s: the decade’s greatest high performance heroes together at last

February 11, 2026

Kia PV5 Cargo van review

February 10, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Motors MachineMotors Machine
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice
Motors MachineMotors Machine
Home»Luxury car»Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV Luggage Test: How much space behind the third row?
Luxury car

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV Luggage Test: How much space behind the third row?

adminBy adminMarch 2, 2023No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV is a three-row vehicle in that it literally has three rows of seats, but to lump it in with other large, luxury three-row vehicles would be generous. Quite simply, that third row and the amount of cargo space behind it are barely usable. Mercedes’ own GLS-Class is far more functional, which means that the EQS SUV is hardly the all-electric answer to the biggest Benz SUV. 

In terms of cargo area specs, I have absolutely no idea what the EQS SUV supposedly provides. The official specs show only the 5-passenger version and even then lists 22.7 cubic-feet “behind rear seats.” There’s WAY more space behind Row 2 than what 22.7 cubes would usually indicate, and WAY less space behind Row 3. This wouldn’t be the first time Mercedes seems to be using a different measuring method, though. Either way, it just validates this whole luggage testing exercise. 

Since I usually only test the areas behind the third row of three-row vehicles, let’s start there. My guess is we’re looking at 11 cubic-feet here or less, but regardless of figures, it’s really small. It was immediately obvious that it was going to be in the running with the Kia Sorento and Mitsubishi Outlander for smallest third-row vehicle I’ve tested. 

As in every luggage test I do, I use two midsize roller suitcases that would need to be checked in at the airport (26 inches long, 16 wide, 11 deep), two roll-aboard suitcases that just barely fit in the overhead (24L x 15W x 10D), and one smaller roll-aboard that fits easily (23L x 15W x 10D). I also include my wife’s fancy overnight bag just to spruce things up a bit (21L x 12W x 12D).

See also  MG3 Hybrid+ long-term test: budget supermini is almost the perfect bargain

We have a new leader! Or loser! Or whatever!

This is the least amount of luggage I’ve been able to fit behind a third row to date. These are the three smallest bags, and as you can see, the fancy bag must be totally smashed just for this to work. So yeah, you’d better buy a roof box and racks if you’re planning on going anywhere for an extended period of time with a full load of people on board.

That said, those people had better be really small, cause there just isn’t much head- or legroom back there. Realistically, the EQS SUV is a five-passenger SUV with a bonus third row available. 

As such, and given the odd cargo numbers, let’s at least take a look at how many bags can fit behind row 2.

All of them, easily, no tricky Tetrising needed, I just chucked them in. This goes to prove that there’s WAY more than 22.7 cubic-feet back there, but it also illustrates why I don’t do luggage tests behind the second rows of three-row vehicles or midsize SUVs in general: I’ll run out of bags from my garage before I can fill the thing.

Therefore, as a two-row midsize SUV, the EQS is totally normal with a very comfortable and spacious back seat. Now let’s take a look at some cargo details.

The good:

Here is the under-floor storage area. It isn’t remotely as large as the deep bin found in the EQS sedan/hatchback, but it’s still plenty useful. That briefcase-looking thing is the charge cord, and there’s obviously space around it. The photo above right shows the handy strap Mercedes includes that lets you keep the storage area lid open while loading.

See also  2025 Ford Maverick Tremor debuts in updated pickup lineup for $41,945

The underfloor storage area can accommodate the cargo cover when not in use, which is always an appreciated feature. It does boot the charging briefcase out, but you can probably live without that in the car or just find a place for it in the rest of the very large cargo area. 

The bad:

To lower the third row, you must press that square bit on the top of the seat (upper left). Fine. The trouble is, you also must press it to bring the seat back up, meaning you cannot do it from the cargo area. Bad. You have to walk around to the rear door, press that square button and flip the seat up from there. The double trouble is, to do that, you have to fold the second-row using the totally acceptable button on its seat top (above right). This is annoying. Maybe a big old strap would be unsightly to hoist the seat up, but at least it works. 

Yet another way in which the EQS SUV isn’t much of a three-row SUV. 

Source link

EQS Luggage MercedesBenz row Space SUV Test
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
admin

Related Posts

Used BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (Mk2, 2022-date) buyer’s guide: the perfect SUV alternative

February 8, 2026

Fiat Panda super test: the 45-year evolution of Italy’s small car icon

February 5, 2026

Long-term test: Cupra Terramar V2

February 3, 2026

Volvo EX30 Extended Range RWD Plus long-term test: EV’s space is starting to shine

February 1, 2026

Vauxhall Frontera vs BYD Atto 2: will the British or Chinese SUV reign supreme?

January 30, 2026

Long-term test: Honda Civic Type R

January 29, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Getting Lost in The Land Rover Trek Competition

December 12, 2021

A Brief History in Zero to 60 MPH

December 12, 2021

New Kia K4 review: a Korean counter-attack on the VW Golf

February 11, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest Reviews
Reviews

New Kia K4 review: a Korean counter-attack on the VW Golf

By adminFebruary 11, 2026
Reviews

Iconic cars of the 1990s: the decade’s greatest high performance heroes together at last

By adminFebruary 11, 2026
Reviews

Kia PV5 Cargo van review

By adminFebruary 10, 2026
Most Popular

The EV price war is here, and it’s “no pain, no gain” for automakers

February 6, 2023

2024 Honda Civic Hybrid due as sedan and hatchback, but no PHEV

January 26, 2023

Ferrari Amalfi Review: A GT Refined, Not Reinvented

July 23, 2025
Subscribe
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Almaville Media.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.