Close Menu
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice
What's Hot

VW opens orders for the lower-priced ID. Cross, starting at $31,000

October 20, 2026

Nissan Pathfinder Celebrates Its 1980s Roots, But The Next One Will Be Far More Retro

October 20, 2026

Your EV's Range Is Usually Set In Stone. Not This One

October 20, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Motors MachineMotors Machine
  • News
  • Featured
  • Electric Cars
  • Luxury Cars
  • Reviews
  • Advice
Motors MachineMotors Machine
Home»Electric car»SpaceX would not exist if this crucial early launch failed, Musk says
Electric car

SpaceX would not exist if this crucial early launch failed, Musk says

SofiaBy SofiaSeptember 1, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Elon Musk recently restated a fact that still defines SpaceX’s origin story: if Falcon 1’s fourth launch had failed, the company would not exist. The comment answered a reminder that after three consecutive losses, SpaceX had money for only one more attempt.

On X, Peter Diamandis said that the present-day acknowledgement of SpaceX’s success does not discount the rough start the company had. “Almost nobody remembers that Elon’s first rocket failed three times, and there was money for exactly only one more attempt.”

Musk said, “If the 4th launch had failed, SpaceX would not exist.”

If the 4th launch had failed, SpaceX would not exist

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 30, 2026

In late 2008, the firm was nearly out of cash. Another failure would have ended payroll, closed the Hawthorne factory, and left the Falcon 9 and Dragon programs as unfinished drawings.

The first flight lifted off from Omelek Island on 24 March 2006. Thirty-three seconds later, a corroded aluminum fitting on a fuel line leaked. Kerosene ignited around the Merlin engine, control was lost, and the vehicle came apart. The small DARPA payload, FalconSAT-2, survived the short flight only to land on a storage shed near the pad. Investigators later traced the fitting to a materials mix-up that should never have reached the rocket.

Flight 2, on 21 March 2007, looked far better at first. The first stage burned cleanly and handed off to the Kestrel-powered upper stage. The vehicle crossed 100 kilometers and reached a peak of about 289 kilometers. Then propellant slosh in the second-stage tank started a circular coning motion that grew until the engine shut down. Telemetry faded as the stage tumbled, and SpaceX had reached space but not orbit. Over the next year, the team redesigned everything from the ground up, including tanks, baffles, and the new regeneratively cooled Merlin 1C.

See also  California offers up to $100,000 per port for EV fast chargers

That engine flew on Flight 3 on 2 August 2008. The first stage performed almost perfectly and reached 217 kilometers. After main-engine cutoff, leftover fuel in the cooling channels produced a faint residual thrust, roughly 10 pounds per square inch of chamber pressure. On a Texas test stand, the effect was invisible beneath ambient air pressure. In vacuum it was enough to push the spent first stage back into the second stage after separation. The stages collided, the upper stage spun, and the mission was lost. Musk later said a slightly longer delay before staging would have saved the flight.

Six weeks later, the team assembled Flight 4 from remaining parts and flew it on 28 September 2008 at 23:15 UTC. The payload was Ratsat, a 165-kilogram aluminum mass simulator built in-house. Staging was delayed so residual thrust could decay. The Kestrel ignited, the fairing split away, and nine and a half minutes after liftoff the vehicle was in orbit. After a coast, the second stage restarted, settling into a 621-by-643-kilometer path at 9.35 degrees inclination. Falcon 1 became the first privately developed liquid-fueled rocket to reach Earth orbit. Musk called the insertion “middle of the bull’s-eye.”

SpaceX restores a Falcon 1 rocket for 10th anniversary of first launch success

That success unlocked NASA’s Commercial Resupply Services award later that year. Without it, there would have been no Falcon 9, no reusable first stages, and no Dragon cargo or crew flights to the International Space Station. Launch prices would have remained far higher. Starlink’s constellation would not exist; broadband from low Earth orbit would still be a paper concept.

See also  Rolls-Royce’s Latest Problem: Keeping Its New EV’s Cashmere Roof Intact At 176°F

Ride-share markets, high launch cadence, and the current pace of lunar and Mars hardware would be years behind. Communications, Earth observation, and the cost of putting anything into space would look more like the 2000s than the 2020s.

One extra second of residual thrust in August 2008 would have written a different decade.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Sofia

Related Posts

VW opens orders for the lower-priced ID. Cross, starting at $31,000

October 20, 2026

Your EV's Range Is Usually Set In Stone. Not This One

October 20, 2026

Flying, flipping Tesla Roadster delivered on style, THESE EVs deliver on substance

October 20, 2026

Used EVs Hit A Record Share Of Overall Used Car Sales In September

October 19, 2026

This new electric motorcycle with a giant hole in it wants to change how you ride

October 19, 2026

Elon Musk reveals why Boring Co’s biggest East Coast project never happened

October 19, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

VW opens orders for the lower-priced ID. Cross, starting at $31,000

October 20, 2026

Nissan Pathfinder Celebrates Its 1980s Roots, But The Next One Will Be Far More Retro

October 20, 2026

Your EV's Range Is Usually Set In Stone. Not This One

October 20, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest Reviews
Reviews

Volkswagen T-Cross review

By SofiaOctober 10, 2026
Reviews

Used SsangYong Korando (Mk4, 2019-date) buyer’s guide: an SUV for just £10k

By SofiaOctober 9, 2026
Reviews

New MINI Cooper Paul Smith Edition 2026 review: fun, unique and understated

By SofiaOctober 8, 2026
Most Popular

GM’s new EV battery tech will cut costs without sacrificing range

September 30, 2026

Renault And Geely’s New Turbo Engine Keeps Running While Fully Underwater

September 8, 2026

Tesla’s next big clean energy source is rising in the Arizona desert

October 10, 2026
Subscribe
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Almaville Media.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.